Tuesday, August 10, 2010

護家協會與平等公義協會投訴無線香港先生選舉違反性別歧視條例


護家協會與平等公義協會於2009年9月向本港平機會跟據性別歧視條例投訴無線翡翠台於本年7月25日晚八時半至十時半播出的「2009年香港先生選舉」的節目內容違反性別歧視條例,重點如下:

1. 該節目現場幾百位評判及現場觀眾均為女性,拒絕讓男性參與評審及入場作現場觀眾,明顯是性別歧見視,當中的男士投票和評審權明顯被剝奪了。

2. 該節目中充斥著女性評判和觀眾對參賽之男士作出尖叫和撫摸式之情慾挑逗情景,給人參賽者淪為供女性觀賞及褻玩的對象之感覺,明顯涉及對男性的性騷擾。

3. 在該選舉節目的泳裝環節中,參賽者穿著幾乎透明的外衣及三角泳褲,在水柱中除下上衫,近乎赤裸地濕身走去女性評判前,做出各種動作拉票,包括在女評判面前跪低、親吻女評判,其實亦蘊涵一種男女間的性騷擾的行為。

4. 該節目因為亦在美加等地播放,容易造成對華人產生誤會,亦會增加種族歧視的發生機會!例如讓人以為華人的男男女女都是好色之徒,缺乏內在美德 !其實也構成種族歧視─甚至是間接種族中傷!

護家協會啟

Monday, January 18, 2010

來函照登:投訴節目《逐格鬥》首集「pat 鬥 pat」環節

廣管局主席 鈞鑒,

翡翠台及高清翡翠台於本月十日晚上,聯播節目《逐格鬥》首集「pat 鬥 pat」環節;本月十六日亞視本港台和亞洲高清台,則聯播節目《財神到》拍打臀部環節。筆者現投訴它們同樣呈現不雅姿勢,並投訴後者《財神到》有戲弄女參賽者、冒犯女性及扭曲體罰意識之嫌。

二零一零年一月十日,《逐格鬥》第一集的第二節後段起,開始發放其「pat 鬥 pat」環節。首先是眾主持展示一個喻意暴露臀部的道具,跟著是要求每名參賽藝員蹲下,去貼著其對手的臀部,試圖致使對手出界。整齣環節的播映時間,大約是從當晚九時廿五分至九時四十分。參考網址如下
  1. http://mytv.tvb.com/variety/checkboardjackpot/103742#page-1
  2. http://mytv.tvb.com/variety/checkboardjackpot/103742/1305#page-1

隨後是二零一零年一月十六日晚上八時三十分至九時三十分的《財神到》。節目男主持曾經先後要求兩名女參賽者彎腰伏下,跟著是以小型黑色拍「愛心小手」,拍打她們各別的臀部,以示「懲罰」她們。參考網址——
http://app.hkatv.com/atvnews/main.php?id=3336

上述兩者要眾參賽者伏下,露出其屬乎私處的臀部,可謂不雅。相關電視台俱將如此不雅情節在合家歡時段一一播放,實屬不當。(待續)

Raymond

Monday, December 28, 2009

來函照登:投訴無線台慶劇「活著」第2及3輯內容不雅和殘暴


尊敬的廣管局主席:

本人注意到無線翡翠台於本年11月18 日及19日晚上十時半至十一時播出的「活著」台慶特輯節目中,內容竟有男士全祼和以弓箭射穿牛頸取血即時飲用的血腥鏡頭,意識不良,令人感到反感和不安,現就以下事情作出投訴:

  1. 該節目真有不雅、淫褻及暴虐鏡頭,由活著第二集「原始生活」(播出日期:本年11月18日)中特寫一非洲男孩下體近鏡暴露鏡頭開始,至一位土著男士的成人禮跳牛儀式等,皆是不必要,不應該和可以用一較含蓄的手法來表達。
  2. 該節目的播放時段雖然是晚上十時半至十一時,但現實生活中仍有不少青少年觀眾;另外,該節目於第二集後給第三集宣傳廣告中宣傳茹毛飲血,有殘酷虐待牛隻鏡頭──以弓箭射入牛頸取血生喝!這組鏡頭於第三集(播出日期:本年11月19日)中亦有播放,明顯是違反了愛護動物的原則,亦有吹噓啫血的壞習慣, 。
懇請 貴局認真跟進,還我們一個健康的「合家歡」頻道!謝謝。

嘉麗師奶 上

護家協會投訴無線電視台慶劇「活著」第二及三集有不雅和殘暴鏡頭

尊敬的廣管局主席何沛謙先生:
(廣管局24小時投訴熱線:(852) 2827 8488、傳真:(852) 2507 2219、電郵:ba@tela.gov.hk

本會最近收到會友投訴無線翡翠台於本年11月18 日及19日晚上十時半至十一時播出的「活著」台慶特輯節目中內容男士全祼和以弓箭射穿牛頸取血即時飲用的鏡頭,意識不良,令人感到反感和不安,現就以下事情作出投訴:

該節目中雖然拍得不錯,也很寫實,是一記實特輯﹝documentary﹞,但仍應遵守業務守則中格外小心謹慎來處理,以免令觀眾震驚或反感的要求﹝見電視通用業務守則2章1節、3章1及3節﹞。

在該節目的不雅、淫褻或暴虐鏡頭大致如家長參考網所載﹝注意:內有兒童不宜畫像!﹞的鏡頭剪輯,由活著第二集「原始生活」(播出日期:本年11月18日)中特寫一非洲男孩下體近鏡暴露鏡頭開始,至一位土著男士的成人禮跳牛儀式等,皆是不必要,不應該和可以用一較含蓄的手法來表達﹝例如男童暴露下體的事實不應以近鏡來展示,而跳牛儀式中的男士下體部分應以打格仔形式來遮掩。﹞,無線方面以近鏡和毫不遮掩的手法來展示相關鏡頭,容易令家庭觀眾尷尬或反感,實際上已違返了守則5章2節的規定。

該節目的播放時段雖然是晚上十時半至十一時,但現實生活中仍有很多一家大小的觀眾正在觀看,估計收視率也有十多廿點,所以無線方面最基本的做法是應把該節目歸類為家長指引類別﹝見守則8章3節﹞

另外,該節目於第二集後給第三集宣傳廣告中宣傳茹毛飲血,有殘酷虐待牛隻鏡頭──以弓箭射入牛頸取血生喝!這組鏡頭於第三集(播出日期:本年11月19日)中亦有播放,應該是違反了守則第3章3節(沒有避免令觀眾反感)及17節(沒有家長指引提示)、6章2節(射牛取血的殘暴程度過甚)及7章6節(刻劃過分逼真,易被模仿)。

還有其他違反守則事情,詳見附表一。

在徵詢法律意見後,本會認為以上被投訴事項甚有可能已違反了廣管局訂定的《電視通用業務守則 -節目標準》的相關條款﹝即文中所提守則章節及條例等項目﹞。

雖然「活著」整體拍得不錯,但以揭示原始風俗為由,而罔顧本港的道德和法治標準,公然在數以十萬計的家庭觀眾面前展示男性性器官和虐畜殘忍行為,實在是挑戰法治的界限,亦挑戰市民的良知!試想想,舉世的怪異風俗多不勝數,以中國為例就有河神娶妻,及至上世紀,國內仍有人向河神獻孩子以求建造過海大橋能成功的事;而很多地方﹝甚至今天﹞都有食人習俗存在,類似之習俗,若以展示習俗原貌為由,公然在免費的家庭頻道中播放,必會造成嚴重惡果!

今天貴局若允准無線以記實為由而容許赤身露體之鏡頭,其他各影視媒體必可以用類似的理由﹝例如藝術、寫實報導、教育…等﹞把類似的裸露、暴力和淫褻鏡頭任意播放,則社會的道德標準必蕩然無存,必導致一般家庭﹝特別是草根階層﹞再無真正的「合家歡」頻道可看,甚至是傳統家庭之瓦解,男女關係越來越混亂,其惡果必會蠶食本港社會之有限資源及荼毒我們的下一代,懇請貴局慎而重之,發輝你們的監察職能,以維護本港的合理道德水平,造福社會,為荷。

敬希查實作覆,祝安

愛護家庭家長協會 上
2009年12月12日


附表一:活著第二輯﹝原始生活﹞和第三輯﹝茹毛飲血﹞的違例事情

活著第二集及第三集的不雅/淫穢鏡頭 (警告:內有兒童不宜不雅和殘酷照片)

Monday, November 23, 2009

投訴無線2008-2009年香港先生選舉不雅和侮辱男士


護家協會經與美國公義平等協會交換意見後,發覺無線2008及2009年香港先生選舉不雅和侮辱男士,正委託代表向廣管局提出申訴,希望有關當局能正視,並對投訴給與一個暨公平又有利維持一個健康影視環境的判決,因為普羅大眾,特別是草根階層是十分需要一個真正合家歡頻道和健康節目的。

護家協會 啟

(註) 以下是相關的投訴和新聞評述連結
  1. 香港先生選 拔 賽挑逗情慾被批
  2. 香港性文化學會 給無線電視「香港先生選舉」的公開信
  3. 參賽者身體任摸 “香港先生”選舉被指侮辱男性
  4. 參賽者身體任摸 香港先生選舉被指侮辱男性

Monday, November 9, 2009

愛護家庭家長協會投訴TVB 2009 香港先生選舉

尊敬的廣管局主席何沛謙先生:

素仰閣下能者多勞,任重道遠,本會最近收到會友投訴無線翡翠台於本年7 月25 日晚八時半至十時半播出的「2009 香港先生選舉」的節目內容感到反感和不安,現就以下事情作出投訴:

  1. 該節目中充斥著女性評判和觀眾對參賽之男士作出尖叫和撫摸式之情慾挑逗情景,給人參賽者淪為供女性觀賞及褻玩的對象之感覺,明顯涉及對男性的性騷擾。﹝見電視通用業務守則5章1節﹞
  2. 在該選舉節目的泳裝環節中,參賽者穿著幾乎透明的外衣及三角泳褲,在水柱中除下上衫,近乎赤裸地濕身走去女性評判前,做出各種動作拉票,包括在女評判面前跪低、親吻女評判,其實亦蘊涵一種男對女的性騷擾的行為。這些比賽環節和鏡頭,容易令家庭觀眾尷尬或反感,實屬不必要,亦不應出現。﹝見守則5章2節﹞
  3. 該節目的播放時段是星期六晚上八時半至十時半,是現實生活中的合家歡時段,更適逢是中小學校的暑假期間 [見守則2章6節],所以有不少兒童和青少年觀眾,也包括很多外傭﹝如菲傭和印傭等﹞;而她們一般不能完全明白廣東話的節目內容。所以,上述人士在耳濡目染,一知半解的情況下,容易對香港先生的形象和典範產生誤會,例如誤會男士穿上泳裝時便是為了向女士炫耀身體,甚至是有所意圖、或想入非非等!這明顯會誤導和防礙兒童和青少年的身心發展,亦會加劇一部分家傭與顧主間的尷尬,甚至導致不必要的衝突!這亦會增加種族歧視的發生機會![參種族歧視條例(第602章)]
  4. 該節目除了在本港播放外,亦有在美加的華人電視頻道播放,容易造成外國人對華人的誤解、偏見以至是歧視,因為該節目中頻頻出現上述(1)-(3)項的情境,事實上,該節目不論在本港或美加等地已引起了相當多的投訴,顯明相關內容確實會使觀眾反感和不安!
  5. 另外,該選舉節目只容納女性作為現評判及觀眾,拒絕讓男性參與評審及入場作現場觀眾,明顯是性別歧見視,例如男士的現場投票和評審權明顯被剝奪了。[見12章3節;參性別歧視條例(第480章)]
在徵詢法律意見後,本會認為以上被投訴事項甚有可能已違反了廣管局訂定的《電視通用業務守則 -節目標準》的相關條款﹝即文中所提守則章節及條例等項目﹞。


敬希查實作覆,祝安

愛護家庭家長協會

Complaint against TVB's 2008-9 Mr. Hong Kong Contests by OJE


According to the Organization for Justice and Equality (OJE) of the States, their alliance has already submitted a complaint to the Hong Kong Broadcasting Authority against TVB's 2008 and 2009 Mr. Hong Kong Contests in early November this year.

The concerned Mr. Hong Kong Contest Shows were broadcasted in Hong Kong on the Jade Channel on August 2 of 2008 at 8:30 p.m. and on July 25 of 2009 at 8:30 p.m. respectively. They were also broadcast in various countries including the United States of America and Canada. These programs showed sexually provocative behaviors and setting, besmirched the images of both Chinese men and Chinese women, discriminated against males, and caused family audience to be very embarrassed and affected the youngsters deleteriously.

OJE was demanding TVB to make significant improvements including showing the concerned programs only after 10:00 p.m. which is the effective off "prime time" watershed by today's standard. Besides, TVB should NOT discriminate against men by allowing only female audience and judges in the show. It should also abandon the sexual harassment of the male contestants wearing only wet and tight Speedo swimwear by sex-thirsty screaming female audience.

TVB was also requested to honor the cultural and racial factors pertaining to Chinese communities in various parts of the world where the Mr. Hong Kong programs would be broadcasted. OJE was of the opinion that TVB’s production of Mr. Hong Kong programs violated various sections of the Generic Code of Practice on Programme Standards (the Code), issued by Hong Kong Broadcasting Authority pursuant to section 3 of the Broadcasting Ordinances (Cap. 562). The main reasons are:
  1. A major part of the program was similar to a male stripper show to which no audience under 18 should be admitted. TVB violated the Code, chapter 3 section 3, which requires producers to preserve decency and decorum in producing TV programs so as not to cause embarrassment and offend viewers.
  2. In both the alleged shows, the specifics of the male contestants’ sex organs were exposed due to the tight wet swimwears, making public and explicit what many people regard as private and exclusive, thus violating chapter 5 section 1 of the Code.
  3. The continuous screaming, whistling, and sexual harassment by the all-female audience towards the male contestants were disgusting and intolerable to family audience especially children. For example, in the show on 25/07/09, Miriam Yeung (楊奷嬅), the female M.C., even said something alluding to the contestant's swinging (of his sex organ--added for clarification)!” These were definitely very indecent, appealing to prurient interest, and not presented with tact and discretion, thus violating chapter 5 section 1 and 2 of the Code. These were shocking and offending the viewers, in violation of chapter 2 section 1 of the Code.
  4. The programs substantially lowered the moral standard of regular television broadcasts for general audience in Hong Kong. It sullied the image of females who were basically depicted as sex thirsty women in the shows. People were shocked that the TVB advertisement of the show in 2008 even showed a Chinese woman with a bleeding nose staring at an almost nude man. Again, chapter 2 section 1 and chapter 5 section 1 of the Code were violated. 
  5. The contests seriously discriminated against and humiliated males as only female audience and judges were allowed. The male contestants, only covered individually by a tight and wet Speedo swimwear and with their bodies wetted through down, had to walk close to the female judges to be harassed and even probed by them including at their breasts.
  6. By broadcasting these salacious and offensive programs at 8:30 p.m., TVB has caused deleterious and undesirable effects on viewers under 18 years of age. In accordance with chapter 7 section 3 and chapter 2 section 6 of the Code, when there is a large audience of children or young viewers, the producers need to follow more stringent guidelines even at or after 8:30 p.m. since the concerned shows were broadcast on Saturday evenings during the school summer holidays.
In accordance with the laws of Hong Kong, probing or touching a person of the other sex in public especially at such personal parts as the breasts is a criminal offence liable upon conviction to imprisonment of 10 years. The aforesaid phenomena definitely denigrated and insulted the male contestants based on gender, and were in violation of chapter 2 section 2b of the Code. In fact, scenes in which pleasure is taken in the infliction of humiliation upon others should be avoided (chapter 7 section 4), and scenes in which the infliction or acceptance of humiliation is associated with sexual pleasure should be eliminated (chapter 7 section 5). The alleged contests were in violation of both.

Since the program was shown in various countries, TVB needs to follow chapter 3 section 20 of the Code. That is they should have respect for the cultural, religious, and racial sensitivities of the intended recipient countries and places. Similar requirement is also specified in chapter 5 section 9 regarding non-domestic broadcast.

OJE also opined that the Mr. Hong Kong Shows have tarnished the image of both Chinese men and women as Chinese men were shown as degraded gigolos willing to be humiliated and discriminated against in the shows. Also, Chinese women were depicted as lecherous and sensuous ladies eagerly probing the contestants' bodies. Therefore, the elegant, poised, and decent image of Chinese ladies was totally shattered by the irresponsible shows.

Reported by Citizen Lai (independent observer)